ECCE! BEHOLD THE ECC


Sweet & Maxwell's European Commercial Cases have never before been mentioned on this blog, but they are from time to time a useful research resource for anyone who is trying to track down English-language decisions from non-English speaking national courts. Part I of the ECC for 2005 is s case in point: it carries an English version of the extremely short but to-the-point judgment of the Cour de Cassation, France, in Banque de France v Editions Catherine Audval -- a 2002 decision that banknotes are NOT intelledtual property (unlike the position in some other jurisdictions).

The ECC used to look like this, before it got its recent makeover,
but Sweet & Maxwell's website hasn't been updated yet ...
ECCE! BEHOLD THE ECC ECCE! BEHOLD THE ECC Reviewed by Jeremy on Friday, March 11, 2005 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Powered by Blogger.